Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/9/1988

Webb v. State

Citations

760 S.W.2d 263
1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 236
1988 WL 118347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that although a defendant had filed a motion in limine, he had the burden “of requesting a correct limiting instruction”
recognizing that finding a pretrial identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive will obviate the need to assay whether it created “substantial likelihood of misidentification”
holding that information from citizen-witness was sufficiently reliable under totality of the circumstances, even though officer did not obtain witness's name
holding that obtaining a ruling on a motion in limine is not sufficient to preserve error for review, but rather there must be a proper contemporaneous objection to the proffered evidence
holding that it is axiomatic that motions in limine do not preserve error
holding 911 recording admissible over rule 403 objection, even though not establishing material facts, because the recording 5 provides framework for developing evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Miller, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

350 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.