Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/19/1983

Hawkins v. State

Citations

660 S.W.2d 65
1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that contentions involving noncompliance with art. 36.27 cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a timely objection
holding that contentions involving noncompliance with art. 36.27 cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a timely objection
holding that contentions involving noncompliance with art. 36.27 cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a timely objection
holding that contentions involving noncompliance with art. 36.27 cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a timely objection
concluding that commenting on fact that defendant slept during his trial amounts to little more than directing the jury's attention to that which jurors had already witnessed
comment referring to jury's observations of defendant not improper where defendant fell asleep numerous times during trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom G. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

257 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.