Skip to main content

Arnold v. State

Citations

  • 873 S.W.2d 27
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 176
  • 1993 WL 457204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to examine state constitutional grounds where appellant failed to analyze, argue, or provide authority to establish that his protection under Texas Constitution was different from that provided by United States Constitution
  • refusing to examine state constitutional grounds where appellant failed to analyze, argue, or provide authority to establish that his protection under the Texas Constitution was different from that provided by the United States Constitution
  • defendant having been adjudged insane before the offense is presumed insane at the time of the subsequent offense
  • defendant having been adjudged insane before the offense is presumed insane at the time of the subsequent offense
  • defendant rejected lawyers’ advice and refused to permit lawyers to cross-examine several witnesses
  • “Appellant fails to analyze, argue or provide authority to establish that his protection under the Texas Constitution exceeds or differs from that provided to him by the Federal Constitution. We therefore do not address appellant‟s state constitutional argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Clinton, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

158 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.