Skip to main content

Simpson v. State

Citations

  • 119 S.W.3d 262
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 510
  • 2003 WL 22244663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reviewing court cannot reach out on an issue that was not raised
  • providing that the wishes of a victim’s family member as to a defendant’s fate exceed the parameters of victim-impact evidence and are not admissible
  • stating that ordinarily, a prompt instruction to disregard will cure error associated with an improper jury argument
  • stating that ordinarily, a prompt instruction to disregard will cure error associated with an improper jury argument
  • providing that the wishes of a victim’s family members as to a defendant’s fate are beyond the parameters of victim-impact evidence
  • concluding, after reviewing evidence against appellant, that trial court's prompt instruction cured any prejudice and that trial court did not abuse discretion in overruling motion for mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

468 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Simpson v. State

348 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.