Court of Appeals of Texas· 5/21/1986
Simpson v. State
Citations
- 709 S.W.2d 797
- 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 7582
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was 9 no reversible error when the trial court, over the appellant’s objection, failed to instruct the jury that the burden of proof was on the State but correctly instructed the jury as to the measure of proof that is required for a conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fender, Hopkins, Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nored v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-03-14· cited 52×
- Nolen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-26· cited 45×
- Dees v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1986-12-11· cited 34×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1990-04-04· cited 17×
- Mills v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1993-05-26· cited 16×
- Olivarez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1988-08-17· cited 15×
- Herman P. Gullatt, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2011-08-24· cited 9×
- Newhouse v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-08-02· cited 6×
- Mena v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-29· cited 4×
- Behring v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-04· cited 1×
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-08-31· cited 1×
- James Walter Brennan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1993-09-15
- Garry W. Entress v. Dr. Robert H. BrinkleyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-07-29
- Braziel, William Heth v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2004-07-08
- Terry Wayne Schwalbach v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-02-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.