Skip to main content

Salazar v. State

Citations

  • 127 S.W.3d 355
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 1045
  • 2004 WL 210571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding joinder not unfairly prejudicial where it was likely that other victims’ testimony would have been admissible to refute defensive theory that complainants’ stories were influenced by suggestive questioning
  • holding joinder not unfairly prejudicial where it was likely that other victims’ testimony would have been admissible to refute defensive theory that complainants’ stories were influenced by suggestive questioning
  • holding no abuse of discretion shown where trial court conducted a single trial involving four counts of sexual abuse of four separate children that spanned a three month time period
  • holding joinder not unfairly prejudicial where it was likely that other victims = testimony would have been admissible to refute defensive theory that complainants = stories were influenced by suggestive questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adele Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.