Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/30/2002

Johnson v. State

Citations

68 S.W.3d 644
2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17
2002 WL 122735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that extraneous offense evidence was admissible where the offenses were committed within a few hours of each other, directed at lone women, and involving another victim's red Ford Taurus
holding that extraneous offense evidence was admissible where the offenses were committed within a few hours of each other, directed at lone women, and involving another victim's red Ford Taurus
holding that to determine similarity of offenses appellate courts should take into account specific characteristics of offenses and time interval between them
holding that Johnson consented to the search even though no Miranda warnings were given and no consent to search form was signed
holding that extraneous offense evidence was admissible where the offenses were committed within a few hours of each other, directed at lone women, and involving another victim = s red Ford Taurus
holding that in search and seizure issues reviewing courts are to give \almost total deference\ to a trial court's rulings on questions that turn on an evaluation of witness credibility and demeanor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,016 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.