Skip to main content

Cain v. State

Citations

  • 947 S.W.2d 262
  • 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54
  • 1997 WL 331774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that former Rule 81(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires harm analysis for all trial errors except those held “structural” by Supreme Court
  • holding that former Rule 81(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires harm analysis for all trial errors except those held “structural” by Supreme Court
  • holding that all errors, except certain federal constitutional errors labeled as “ structural ” by United States Supreme Court, are subject to harm analysis
  • holding that all errors, except certain federal constitutional errors labeled as “ structural ” by United States Supreme Court, are subject to harm analysis
  • holding that all errors, except certain federal constitutional errors labeled as A structural @ by the United States Supreme Court, are subject to a harm analysis
  • holding that former Rule 81(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires harm analysis for all trial errors except those held \structural\ by Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Baird, Mansfield, Overstreet, Meyers, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

781 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.