Skip to main content

Hawkins v. State

Citations

  • 135 S.W.3d 72
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 899
  • 2004 WL 1103290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an instruction that “the jury is so instructed,” when counsel asked for a particular instruction, was sufficient to cure error
  • stating that improper argument is incurable when it is “so prejudicial that expenditure of further time and expense would be wasteful and futile”
  • holding that courts should consider effectiveness of curative measures taken
  • noting that the number and nature of other crimes is a relevant factor in whether or not the same punishment would have been assessed without the improper argument
  • noting that the number and nature of other crimes is a relevant factor in whether or not the same punishment would have been assessed without the improper argument
  • adopting Mosley factors to evaluate whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a mistrial for improper argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,016 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hawkins v. State

401 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.