Skip to main content

Gray v. State

Citations

  • 159 S.W.3d 95
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 456
  • 2005 WL 600300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that violation of the state 8 statute designed to protect constitutional right to jury chosen from fair cross-section of community was still treated as a statutory error
  • “Cain issued a ‘broad mandate’ that brought the overwhelming majority of errors within the purview of a harm analysis.”
  • “In summary, when only a statutory violation is claimed, the error must be treated as non-constitutional for the purpose of conducting a harm analysis[.]”
  • \ Cain issued a 'broad mandate' that brought the overwhelming majority of errors within the purview of a harm analysis.\
  • “[E]ven when an error does constitute a violation of the federal constitution, the error is ‘structural’ only if the Supreme Court has labeled it as such.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.