Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 7/9/1987

Simpson v. Midland-Ross Corp.

Citations

  • 823 F.2d 937
  • 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 418
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8871
  • 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where ADEA plaintiff “was not replaced until [three] months after [his] discharge, and the discharge occurred in the context of a reduction in force due to economic necessity[,] ... substantially weaken[ed][his] ... claim.”
  • noting that the use of seventeen employee departures, as a sample for statistical analysis was suspect
  • holding that a sample size of seventeen people was “suspect”
  • finding that a three-month interval between plaintiff’s termination and the hiring of a replacement “substantially weaken[s]” the inference
  • finding that statistical evidence regarding the age of employees hired following the plaintiff’s discharge lacked probative value absent additional information from which to infer discrimination
  • finding sample size of seventeen cases insufficient to support an inference of discrimination in the employment context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Krupansky, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.