Sixth Circuit· 7/9/1987
Simpson v. Midland-Ross Corp.
Citations
- 823 F.2d 937
- 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 418
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8871
- 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,234
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where ADEA plaintiff “was not replaced until [three] months after [his] discharge, and the discharge occurred in the context of a reduction in force due to economic necessity[,] ... substantially weaken[ed][his] ... claim.”
- noting that the use of seventeen employee departures, as a sample for statistical analysis was suspect
- holding that a sample size of seventeen people was “suspect”
- finding that a three-month interval between plaintiff’s termination and the hiring of a replacement “substantially weaken[s]” the inference
- finding that statistical evidence regarding the age of employees hired following the plaintiff’s discharge lacked probative value absent additional information from which to infer discrimination
- finding sample size of seventeen cases insufficient to support an inference of discrimination in the employment context
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engel, Krupansky, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1992-05-21· cited 1,717×
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 1,654×
- Theodore L. Leblanc v. Great American Insurance CompanyFirst Circuit· 1993-09-29· cited 922×
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.First Circuit· 1989-03-28· cited 811×
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2003-01-27· cited 809×
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 648×
- James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesSixth Circuit· 1993-10-21· cited 497×
- Barnes v. GenCorp Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1990-02-22· cited 442×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 2000-03-14· cited 363×
- Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationSixth Circuit· 1990-06-15· cited 323×
- Boyce A. Smith, A/K/A Woody Smith v. Leggett Wire CompanySixth Circuit· 2000-07-17· cited 262×
- Sarah N. PHELPS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YALE SECURITY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1993-02-26· cited 241×
- William Rose, Jr. Orie Reed v. Wells Fargo & CompanyNinth Circuit· 1990-05-08· cited 240×
- Robert Lilley, Cross-Appellee v. Btm Corporation, Cross-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 208×
- Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.First Circuit· 1988-11-22· cited 166×
- James O'COnnOr v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corporation, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeFourth Circuit· 1995-06-08· cited 153×
- Walter McAlester v. United Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware CorporationTenth Circuit· 1988-07-14· cited 151×
- Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1990-11-06· cited 146×
- Harriet Schoonmaker v. Spartan Graphics Leasing, LLCSixth Circuit· 2010-02-03· cited 100×
- Cassandra Thompson v. Fresh Products, LLCSixth Circuit· 2021-01-15· cited 98×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court· 1983-04-04· cited 2,660×
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 1,808×
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,131×
- Mayor of Philadelphia v. Educational Equality LeagueSupreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 420×
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1975-01-10· cited 293×
- Henry W. Segar v. William French Smith, Attorney General, Henry W. Segar, Cross-Appellants v. William French Smith, Attorney GeneralD.C. Circuit· 1984-06-26· cited 275×
- Edward ACKERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1982-02-01· cited 223×
- Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-04-18· cited 212×
- Thomas P. BLACKWELL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1983-01-10· cited 202×
- Rayford C. PACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY SYSTEM, Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1983-04-04· cited 202×
- Haskell v. Kaman Corp.Second Circuit· 1984-08-15· cited 190×
- Clarence F. Davis v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1984-08-16· cited 146×
- Charles LaGRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1984-11-27· cited 137×
- Daniel H. SAHADI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS CHEMICAL, Division of Hoover Ball and Bearing Company, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1980-09-15· cited 135×
- Chappell v. GTE Products Corp.Sixth Circuit· 1986-10-14· cited 125×
- Robert I. RIDENOUR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the LAWSON COMPANY, a Consolidated Foods Company, Defendant-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1986-05-21· cited 124×
- Ned WILKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the EATON CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1986-05-13· cited 109×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.