Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party may not “undertake wholly exploratory operations in the vague hope that something helpful will turn up.”
• noting that the First Circuit’s “narrow view” of equitable tolling reaches only “active deception” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• stating that under the continuing violation doctrine, plaintiff still retains “the burden of demonstrating that some discriminatory act transpired within the appropriate time frame”
• noting that the First Circuit's \narrow view\ of equitable tolling reaches only \active deception\ (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• noting that the First Circuit's \narrow view\ of equitable tolling reaches only \active deception\ (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• noting that in cases of systemic violations it is “unnecessary [for a plaintiff] to identify any single act of discrimination within the limitations period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).