Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, under antidiscrimination law, “the aim is not to review bad business decisions, or question the soundness of an employer’s judgment”
• explaining that the employee does not raise a factual dispute by alleging that the employer made a poor business decision
• noting employee’s disagreement with employer’s evaluation of him does not raise material issue of fact
• applying federal law to decide parallel federal and Michigan claims under the ADEA and ELCRA
• The aim of the courts is not to “review bad business decisions, or question the soundness of an employer’s judgment.”
• employee does not raise a factual dispute by alleging employer made a poor business decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).