William Rose, Jr. Orie Reed v. Wells Fargo & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s use of the phrase “old-boy network” did not support inference of discriminatory motive
• holding that employer's use of the phrase \old-boy network\ did not support inference of discriminatory motive
• holding that Wells Fargo’s policy of committing employment decisions in a RIF to the subjective discretion of its managers constituted a specific employment practice subject to disparate impact analysis
• concluding that plaintiff's statistical evidence was insufficient to raise inference of causation where other evidence demonstrated that workforce after employment action was applied was older than the workforce beforehand
• holding that hiring that occurred much later than termination does not fulfill employee's burden
• noting that \Wells Fargo admits that the process of job elimination and restaffing was otherwise discretionary and sub- jective\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).