Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply guidelines established in McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), to age discrimination cases
• declining to apply guidelines established in McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), to age discrimination eases
• questioning the applicability of McDonnell Douglas guidelines in cases tried to a jury
• stating in dicta that the BFOQ exemption is an affirmative defense
• McDonnell Douglas standards may be applied to age discrimination cases but not automatically
• McDonnell Douglas standards may be applied to age discrimination cases but not automatically

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).