Skip to main content
· 10/21/1993

James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 12 F.3d 1382
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27732
  • 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,720
  • 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that suggestions by law firm shareholders that an attorney retire are not alone sufficient to support a finding of age discrimination
  • finding suggestions by law firm shareholders that an attorney retire was not sufficient to support a finding of age discrimination
  • explaining suggestions that plaintiff retire that were made outside the termination process were “not alone sufficiently indicative of discrimination” and noting that documentation of termination did not reference the plaintiff’s age
  • employer required suspended employee to take a leave of absence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Per Curiam, Rosen, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.