· 10/21/1993
James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 12 F.3d 1382
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27732
- 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,720
- 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that suggestions by law firm shareholders that an attorney retire are not alone sufficient to support a finding of age discrimination
- finding suggestions by law firm shareholders that an attorney retire was not sufficient to support a finding of age discrimination
- explaining suggestions that plaintiff retire that were made outside the termination process were “not alone sufficiently indicative of discrimination” and noting that documentation of termination did not reference the plaintiff’s age
- employer required suspended employee to take a leave of absence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boggs, Per Curiam, Rosen, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.