Skip to main content
· 8/2/1990

Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 907 F.2d 1077
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12865
  • 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,150
  • 53 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 968
  • 1990 WL 96850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an adverse employment action is an element of age discrimination
  • noting that documents offered as direct evidence of discrimination did not constitute direct evidence because they did not “relate to specific actions taken towards [the] plaintiffs”
  • stating that “[o]ne example of direct evidence would be a management memorandum saying, ‘Fire Earley — he is too old’”
  • stating that “[o]ne example of direct evidence would be a management memorandum saying, ‘Fire Earley — he is too old’”
  • holding a position was eliminated when most of the work was transferred to a computerized inventory control system
  • stating that “[o]ne example of direct evidence would be a management memorandum saying, ‘Fire Earley — he is too old’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Edmondson, Peckham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.