Robert Lilley, Cross-Appellee v. Btm Corporation, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that $350,000 mental anguish award for age discrimination was within the realm of other verdicts that have been upheld in similar cases
• holding that $350,000 mental anguish award for age discrimination was within the realm of other verdicts that have been upheld in similar cases
• holding that employee status was an issue for a jury to resolve
• reasoning that defendants “have a substantial interest in controlling the advertising of their products because [they] may be liable for [the plaintiffs] misstatements or misrepresentations”
• reasoning that defendants \have a substantial interest in controlling the advertising of their products because [they] may be liable for [the plaintiff's] misstatements or misrepresentations\
• holding that the district court could not properly reduce the attorney-fee award for time spent on the plaintiff’s unsuccessful age-discrimination claim because it was related to the plaintiff’s successful retaliation claim (citing Hensley, 461 U.S. at 437)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).