Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence of emotional distress even though the plaintiff “demonstrated a high level of concern” by “complain[ing] to management on a regular basis”
• refusing to mandate a remit-titur of a $150,000 pain and suffering award in an Elliott-Larsen age discrimination case
• explaining courts generally construe motions to reconsider as motions to alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59
• construing a motion for reconsideration as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment
• construing a motion for reconsideration as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment
• construing a motion for reconsideration as a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).