Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 405
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 7632
  • 2006 WL 2482496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that jury could have inferred requisite intent from child’s testimony that defendant reached under her shirt to touch her breasts
  • in light of surrounding circumstances, jury can infer intent to commit indecency with a child from the child’s testimony that defendant touched her breasts
  • “No oral expression of intent or visible evidence of sexual arousal is necessary.”
  • “No oral expression of intent or visible evidence of sexual arousal is necessary.”
  • applying medical cream to an eleven-year-old child = s vagina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.