Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 7/7/2008

Kucana v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 533 F.3d 534
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14478
  • 2008 WL 2639039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a challenge to the BIA’s determination that the petitioner’s country conditions had not worsened to the extent of justifying reopening was non-reviewable
  • concluding that a challenge to the BIA's determination that the petitioner's country conditions had not worsened to the extent of justifying reopening was non-reviewable
  • concluding that a challenge to the BIA’s determination that the petitioner’s country conditions had not worsened to the extent of justifying reopening was non-reviewable
  • concluding that a challenge to the BIA’s determination that the petitioner’s country conditions had not worsened to the extent of just ifying reopening was non-reviewable
  • concluding that a challenge to the BIA’s determination that the petitioner’s country conditions had not worsened to the extent of just ifying reopening was non-reviewable
  • holding that the court has no jurisdiction to review the denial of a continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.