Supreme Court· 4/19/1995

Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Citations

514 U.S. 386
115 S. Ct. 1537
131 L. Ed. 2d 465
1995 U.S. LEXIS 2846
95 Daily Journal DAR 4928
63 U.S.L.W. 4294
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2868
8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 699
17 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the courts of appeal lack jurisdiction to review an untimely petition for review
holding that judicial review provisions \are mandatory and jurisdictional . . . and are not subject to equitable tolling\ (internal citations and quotations omitted)
holding that judicial review provisions “are mandatory and jurisdictional ... and are not subject to equitable tolling” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
holding that finality of removal order “is not affected by the subsequent filing of a motion to reconsider”
holding that filing motion for reconsideration does not toll the period for filing a petition for judicial review of underlying order of deportation
holding that a court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review a BIA decision if the petition for review is filed after the statutory deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsbukg, Breyer, O'Connor, Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

746 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.