Neama El Sayed Ramadan Gaser Hesham El Gendy v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board’s application of the changed circumstances exception to undisputed facts presents a “mixed question[ ] of fact and law” subject to our review under section 106 of the Real ID Act
• holding that the Board's application of the changed circumstances exception to undisputed facts presents a \mixed question[ ] of fact and law\ subject to our review under section 106 of the Real ID Act
• holding that, under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), review of changed circumstances determinations is limited to questions of law, including the application of law to undisputed facts
• holding that the REAL ID Act “does not restore jurisdiction over discretionary determinations”
• holding that our jurisdiction only extends to application of the law to undisputed facts
• concluding that the phrase “questions of law” includes “the application of statutes and regulations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).