Seventh Circuit· 8/27/2009
Joseph v. Holder
Citations
- 579 F.3d 827
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19313
- 2009 WL 2616257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding to afford lesser deference to a non-precedential, one-member decision of the Board
- applying Auer, reasoning in part that an interpretation in a single-member, non-precedential, BIA decision was inconsistent with the plain language of a regulation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovner, Wood, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miller v. HermanSeventh Circuit· 2010-03-25· cited 143×
- CE Design, Ltd. v. PRISM BUSINESS MEDIA, INC.Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-27· cited 84×
- Roderick Go v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-03-07· cited 84×
- Arobelidze v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2011-07-27· cited 67×
- Moosa v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2011-05-05· cited 59×
- Lezama-Garcia v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-11-30· cited 53×
- Lin Xing Jiang v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2011-03-18· cited 47×
- L. D. G. v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2014-03-12· cited 37×
- Zero Zone, Inc. v. United States Department of EnergySeventh Circuit· 2016-08-08· cited 37×
- Paul Kiorkis v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2011-02-28· cited 27×
- Francisco Reyes-Corado v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2023-08-11· cited 22×
- Shu Han Liu v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2013-06-03· cited 18×
- Vulcan Construction Materials, L.P. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionSeventh Circuit· 2012-10-25· cited 15×
- Ping Zheng v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2012-11-27· cited 13×
- United States v. Dish Network, L.L.C.C.D. Illinois· 2009-11-04· cited 13×
- Samuel Gomez v. Loretta LynchFifth Circuit· 2016-08-05· cited 13×
- Dudi Yahya v. Jefferson B. Sessions IIISeventh Circuit· 2018-05-03· cited 13×
- Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. United States Forest ServiceE.D. California· 2011-05-26· cited 11×
- Xiu Qin Chen v. HolderSeventh Circuit· 2010-06-10· cited 10×
- Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nN.D. Illinois· 2012-10-12· cited 8×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 2,686×
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 2,025×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court· 1999-05-03· cited 1,159×
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 632×
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-07-24· cited 201×
- Li Fang Lin v. MukaseyFourth Circuit· 2008-02-20· cited 165×
- Sejid Smriko v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2004-10-26· cited 145×
- Kucana v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-07-07· cited 125×
- Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation CouncilSupreme Court· 2009-06-22· cited 109×
- Raza v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-04-19· cited 103×
- Li Fang Huang v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-07-15· cited 85×
- Cheng Chen v. GonzalesSeventh Circuit· 2007-08-23· cited 63×
- Siphathiso Mabasa, Maureen Mabasa, and Sinobukhosi Mabasa v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2006-07-26· cited 54×
- Khadije Ali Awad v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralSeventh Circuit· 2003-05-02· cited 43×
- U.S. Freightways Corp., F.K.A. Tnt Freightways Corp., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 2001-11-06· cited 39×
- Oryakhil v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-06-17· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.