Uday P. Singh v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General, 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) did not bar review of an IJ’s denial of a motion to reopen immigration pro- ceedings
• holding that section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) did not bar review of an IJ’s denial of a motion to reopen immigration proceedings
• holding that section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) did not bar review of an IJ’s denial of a motion to reopen immigration proceedings
• stating that the Court reviews the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider under an abuse of discretion standard
• noting that while review of denial of motion to reopen is for abuse of discretion, factual findings underlying denial require the support of substantial evidence
• overruled in part by Kucana

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).