Afzal v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the denial of a continuance was not an abuse of discretion where the respondent “could not point to any prospect of success regarding the reinstatement of his visa”
• “[B]ecause Azfal was no longer in the country legally, he had no foundation from which to pursue his I-485 application for adjustment of status.”
• “[B]ecause Azfal was no longer in the country legally, he had no foundation from which to pursue his I-485 application for adjustment of status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• HASHMI
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2009-07-01· cited 196×
• Ricardo Calma v. Eric Holder, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-05· cited 52×
• Samirah v. Holder
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-12-03· cited 21×
• Malave v. Holder
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-06-29· cited 19×
• Saley Souley v. Eric Holder, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-03-11· cited 14×
• Gustavo Nunez-Moron v. Eric Holder
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-10-30· cited 11×
• Ricardo Calma v. Eric Holder, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 2011-12-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mohammed Subhan v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States
  Seventh Circuit· 2004-10-26· cited 146×
• Kucana v. Mukasey
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-07-07· cited 125×
• Iqbal Ali v. Gonzales
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-09-14· cited 76×

Other cases named Afzal v. Holder

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Afzal v. Holder
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-05-21
• Afzal v. Holder
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-05-21