Alzainati v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a quarrel about the level of detail required in the BIA’s analysis [is] not a colorable due process claim”
• concluding that our 13 jurisdiction extends to a claim that an IJ engaged in a “wholesale failure to consider evidence” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• concluding noncitizen failed to “explain[] how the length of the decision is determinative . . . of constitutional adequacy required by fundamental fairness”
• explaining that an alien cannot “indirectly obtain judicial review of a discretionary ruling that is not directly reviewable” and holding that “[b]ecause § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i
• noting that quarrel about level of detail in BIA decision does not present due process claim
• concluding argument that Board violated due process by not addressing certain evidence in its order was “just a quarrel about the level of detail required in the [Board]’s analysis, not a colorable due process claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).