Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 8/20/2009

Gatimi v. Holder

Citations

  • 578 F.3d 611
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 18718
  • 2009 WL 2568952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a former member of a violent criminal Kenyan faction called the Mungiki was a member of a particular social group, namely former members of Mungiki
  • stating that the on-sight interpretation of the social-visibility requirement “makes no sense” and “cannot be squared” with earlier precedent
  • noting that homosexuals might well pass as heterosexual, and women who have not yet undergone genital mutilation look no different than other women
  • rejecting social distinction and particularity in part because Board failed to explain its reasoning \in this or any other case\
  • rejecting social distinction because “it makes no sense” given examples of previously recognized particular social groups
  • rejecting social distinction and particularity in part because Board failed to explain its reasoning “in this or any other case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gatimi v. Holder

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.