Miah v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the absence of evidence that” an alleged persecutor engaged in “violent criminal conduct . . . at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official,” was enough to deny CAT relief
• explaining \evidence that Bangladeshi officials have been unable to control the activities of [a] criminal gang\ is \insufficient to compel a finding of willful blindness toward the torture of citizens by third parties\ (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).