Juarez v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a creditor’s indemnity claim for defense costs already incurred was noncontingent for purposes of § 502(e)(1)(B) because no future event was needed to trigger a legal duty to pay the claim
• opting for a broader interpretation of co-liability that focuses on the underlying claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).