Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Indiana Supreme Court· 3/14/2003

Kubsch v. State

Citations

  • 784 N.E.2d 905
  • 2003 Ind. LEXIS 218
  • 2003 WL 1153956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure to object at trial to the admission of evidence results in waiver of that issue on appeal
  • holding that where a defendant presented evidence that he did not have access to a handgun, the door was opened to hearsay evidence that the defendant in fact had access to a handgun
  • holding that trial court did not improperly deny defendants’ right to present his defense when the court merely sustained the State’s objection to defendant’s question to a witness improperly calling for speculation and conjecture
  • concluding that opinion testimony from police officer was inadmissible because “[t]here was nothing that Detective Richmond either saw or heard at the scene of the crime, or became aware of through his other senses, that supported the basis for his opinion.”
  • concluding that opinion testimony from police officer was inadmissible because “[t]here was nothing that Detective Richmond either saw or heard at the scene of the crime, or became aware of through his other senses, that supported the basis for his opinion.”
  • stating even where reviewing court had \serious doubts\ whether police detective qualified as expert, court would not substitute its judgment for that of trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.