Cutter v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining there was no need for remand where it was sufficiently clear that the trial court would impose the maximum sentence for the class C felony and order it served consecutively
• “Failure to object to the admission of evidence at trial normally results in waiver and precludes appellate review unless its admission constitutes fundamental error.”
• as a matter of law, a step that “may itself have been innocent, but nonetheless in furtherance of the crime, satisfied the State’s burden of proving venue by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).