Indiana Court of Appeals· 1/29/2004

Bryant v. State

Citations

802 N.E.2d 486
2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 150
2004 WL 170313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that failure to proffer a mitigating circumstance at the sentencing hearing results in waiver of issue for appellate review
holding that age is not a mitigator when someone is just about to turn eighteen years old
concluding that eighteen-year-old defendant’s history of substance abuse was properly considered to be an aggravating circumstance where the defendant had taken no positive steps to treat his addiction
concluding that meaningful consultation did not occur where police secretly watched and recorded consultation
holding that when a defendant is aware that a substance abuse problem exists but does not seek treatment, the failure to act indicates something aggravating rather than mitigating about his character
holding that a defendant is limited on appeal to the specific grounds argued to the trial court and that a new argument raised for the first time on appeal is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Friedlander, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.