Skip to main content
· 9/29/2006

Troutwine Estates Development Co. v. ComSub Design & Engineering, Inc.

Citations

  • 854 N.E.2d 890
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1984
  • 2006 WL 2789043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party was entitled to payment under an unjust enrichment theory for invoiced services
  • applying an analysis similar to that for piercing the corporate veil to determine the personal liability of a LLC’s managers
  • “Without an express contract, written or oral, a party may recover under the theory of unjust enrichment, or quantum meriut.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Sharpnack, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.