Indiana Supreme Court· 5/22/2007
Kubsch v. State
Citations
- 866 N.E.2d 726
- 2007 Ind. LEXIS 360
- 2007 WL 1470641
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the trial court correctly denied introduction of witness’s prior statement where witness could not vouch for statement that she could not remember making
- noting that a defendant who waives his right to counsel for strategic reasons tends to do so knowingly
- trial court correctly denied introduction of witness statement when witness could not vouch for statement she could not even remember making
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-10-05· cited 138×
- Treadway v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-04-08· cited 117×
- Pittman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-05-15· cited 65×
- Wayne D. Kubsch v. Ron NealSeventh Circuit· 2016-09-23· cited 53×
- Hopper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-11-29· cited 51×
- Pelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-02-19· cited 41×
- Butler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-06-27· cited 29×
- Eaton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-26· cited 24×
- John Larkin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-09-30· cited 12×
- Ballard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-12-12· cited 11×
- Wayne D. Kubsch v. Ron NealSeventh Circuit· 2015-08-12· cited 10×
- Camm v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-11-15· cited 9×
- Timothy Hammerlund v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-05-17· cited 8×
- Castel v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-16· cited 6×
- Timothy W. Parish v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-06-27· cited 6×
- Hopper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-04-28· cited 5×
- A.R.M. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07
- Thomas W. Burton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-01-30
- Jeremiah Barnaby Ricks v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-07-08
- Cesar A. Castaneda v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-09-20
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezSeventh Circuit· 1988-12-22· cited 376×
- Kansas v. MarshSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 332×
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-25· cited 142×
- Kubsch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-03-14· cited 129×
- State v. CulbreathTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-10-20· cited 106×
- Poynter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 99×
- United States v. SandlesSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-27· cited 87×
- United States v. Nathan L. Hill and Cordell JamesSeventh Circuit· 2001-06-05· cited 81×
- State v. Tippecanoe County CourtIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-04-02· cited 68×
- Gee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-05-22· cited 68×
- Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-25· cited 63×
- United States v. Vincent ToddSeventh Circuit· 2005-09-07· cited 53×
- United States v. Rosivito HoskinsSeventh Circuit· 2001-03-21· cited 52×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.