United States v. Imad Naim Saadeh, Barbara Sudzus, and Albert Sudzus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suspect was not in custody when he was not treated differently from other persons who happened to be at repair shop when police arrived, and was not exclusive target of their accusatory questioning
• defendant challenged consent of the woman who owned garage where he worked to search the garage
• “[M]ere inconsisten‐ cies in testimony by government witnesses do not establish the government’s knowing use of false testimony”
• “[M]ere inconsisten‐ cies in testimony by government witnesses do not establish the government’s knowing use of false testimony”
• a third party’s consent to search a room allowed the officers to search for money in a toolbox and desk drawer within the room
• discussing the rule against surplusage in statutory construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).