· 7/7/2014
Julia Hutt v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Incorp
Citations
- 757 F.3d 687
- 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1647
- 2014 WL 3033126
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12800
- 123 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s choice to proceed exclusively under the direct method deemed any arguments under the indirect method waived
- explaining that “[a] plaintiff may prove employment discrimination under the ADEA . . . using either the direct method or indirect method”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.