Skip to main content
· 7/7/2014

Julia Hutt v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Incorp

Citations

  • 757 F.3d 687
  • 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1647
  • 2014 WL 3033126
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12800
  • 123 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s choice to proceed exclusively under the direct method deemed any arguments under the indirect method waived
  • explaining that “[a] plaintiff may prove employment discrimination under the ADEA . . . using either the direct method or indirect method”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.