Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Nora Chaib v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 744 F.3d 974
  • 2014 WL 685274
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3417
  • 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,014
  • 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs case failed under the indirect method because she had “not shown that any nonfemale, non-French individual was subject to different treatment than the treatment of which she complains”
  • finding that plaintiff had not provided necessary evidence to meet causation requirement where “the poor performance review lacks any indication that it would not have been issued but for her complaints”
  • “We have assumed without deciding that plaintiffs may bring a claim of a hostile work environment under the ADEA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Hamilton, Kapala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.