Krystal Wilson v. Cook County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a single incident—or even three incidents” does not constitute a widespread municipal custom or practice
• affirming grant of summary judgment because moving cause of sexual harassment was coworker’s conduct, not Cook County’s failure-to investigate or discipline that employee
• explaining that deliberate indifference cannot rely on “20/20 hindsight”
• single incidents do not suffice to establish widespread custom or practice
• .Monell claim failed in part because policy was not the cause of plaintiffs “injury in anything but the ‘but for’ sense”
• “[I]t is clear that a single incident—or even three incidents—do not suffice [to establish a widespread custom or practice].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).