Skip to main content
· 8/16/2013

Frey Corporation v. City of Peoria, Illinois

Citations

  • 735 F.3d 505
  • 2013 WL 4257891
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is “vital” to look to allegations and define property interest at issue
  • holing that when “a third party controls what happens to the property owner’s site approval—and there is nothing secure or durable about an interest controlled by a third party.”
  • “When a party fails to develop an argument in the district court, the argument is waived and we cannot consider it on appeal”
  • “ ‘[PJublie accommodation’ means a refreshment, entertainment, or recreation facility of any kind, whether licensed or not, whose goods, services, facilities, privileges, or advantages are extended, offered, sold, or otherwise made available to the public.”
  • “A party ‘waive[s] the ability to make a specific ar- gument for the first time on appeal when the party fail[s] to present that specific argument to the district court, even though the issue may have been before the district court in more general terms.’”
  • arguments not made to district court are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Williams, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.