Skip to main content
· 3/13/2012

Smith v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.

Citations

  • 674 F.3d 655
  • 2012 WL 833163
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5239
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,438
  • 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in order for complaints to constitute protected activity under the ADEA, \they must include an objection to discrimination on the basis of age.\
  • noting that general complaints about discrimination or harassment, without tethering them to a protected class, is insufficient
  • finding that an EEOC charge filed after the plaintiff was already terminated \doom[ed]\ her retaliation claim because the employer was not aware of it before terminating the employee
  • “In order for Plaintiffs complaints to constitute protected activity, they must include an objection to discrimination on the basis of [race].”
  • “In order for [the plaintiff’s] complaints to constitute protected activity, they must include an objection to discrimination on the basis of age.”
  • EEOC charge filed five months after termination cannot support a claim for ADEA retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovner, Williams, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.