· 3/13/2012
Smith v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.
Citations
- 674 F.3d 655
- 2012 WL 833163
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5239
- 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,438
- 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that in order for complaints to constitute protected activity under the ADEA, \they must include an objection to discrimination on the basis of age.\
- noting that general complaints about discrimination or harassment, without tethering them to a protected class, is insufficient
- finding that an EEOC charge filed after the plaintiff was already terminated \doom[ed]\ her retaliation claim because the employer was not aware of it before terminating the employee
- “In order for Plaintiffs complaints to constitute protected activity, they must include an objection to discrimination on the basis of [race].”
- “In order for [the plaintiff’s] complaints to constitute protected activity, they must include an objection to discrimination on the basis of age.”
- EEOC charge filed five months after termination cannot support a claim for ADEA retaliation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovner, Williams, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.