Federal Circuit· 1/27/1997
In Re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.
Citations
- 105 F.3d 1405
- 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1531
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1229
- 1997 WL 29424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that DELTA is the dominant portion of the mark THE DELTA CAFÉ where the disclaimed word CAFÉ is descriptive of applicant’s restaurant services
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Lourie, Clevenger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
100 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tom Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf)Federal Circuit· 2000-08-15· cited 215×
- In Re Majestic Distilling Company, IncFederal Circuit· 2003-01-02· cited 190×
- Xtreme Lashes, LLC v. Xtended Beauty, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-07-15· cited 178×
- Herbko International, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 132×
- Hewlett-Packard Company v. Packard Press, Inc. (Formerly Packquisition Corporation)Federal Circuit· 2002-03-01· cited 112×
- Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2011-03-28· cited 100×
- In Re Chatam International IncorporatedFederal Circuit· 2004-08-03· cited 67×
- In Re: I.am.symbolic, LLCFederal Circuit· 2017-08-08· cited 64×
- In Re Mighty Leaf TeaFederal Circuit· 2010-04-13· cited 52×
- Han Beauty, Inc. And Trevive, Inc. v. Alberto-Culver CompanyFederal Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 52×
- In Re: Detroit Athletic Co.Federal Circuit· 2018-09-10· cited 43×
- Alliance for Good Government v. Coalition for BettFifth Circuit· 2018-08-22· cited 37×
- M2 Software, Inc. v. M2 Communications, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-06-07· cited 34×
- The Hoover Company v. Royal Appliance Mg. Co.Federal Circuit· 2001-01-31· cited 31×
- Shen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. The Ritz Hotel Limited, CrossFederal Circuit· 2004-12-17· cited 29×
- Stratus Networks, Inc. v. Ubta-Ubet Communications Inc.Federal Circuit· 2020-04-14· cited 12×
- Dewberry Engineers Inc. v. Dewberry Group, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2023-08-09· cited 12×
- Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Park City Solutions, Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-08-09· cited 7×
- Welch Allyn, Inc. v. Tyco International Services AGN.D. New York· 2002-05-14· cited 3×
- Guthrie Healthcare System v. ContextMedia, Inc.S.D. New York· 2014-06-20· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1973-05-03· cited 523×
- In Re National Data CorporationFederal Circuit· 1985-01-30· cited 216×
- Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1983-06-30· cited 142×
- Century 21 Real Estate Corporation v. Century Life of AmericaFederal Circuit· 1992-07-23· cited 128×
- Opryland USA Inc. v. The Great American Music Show, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1992-08-25· cited 120×
- In Re Shell Oil CompanyFederal Circuit· 1993-07-02· cited 100×
- Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationFederal Circuit· 1987-02-17· cited 82×
- Lloyd's Food Products, Inc. v. Eli's, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 70×
- Dan Robbins & Associates v. Questor Corp.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1979-05-24· cited 52×
- Koster v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1982-07-28· cited 37×
- In Re Andreas G. KempsFederal Circuit· 1996-10-08· cited 18×
- In re Clorox Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-06-30· cited 18×
- T. P. Laboratories, Inc. v. HugeE.D. Wisconsin· 1965-12-03· cited 15×
- Application of Calgon CorporationCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-01-07· cited 12×
- Cosmetically Yours, Inc. v. Clairol IncorporatedCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1970-05-07· cited 8×
- Application of Apparel, IncCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1966-10-20· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.