Shen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. The Ritz Hotel Limited, Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that textually identical marks were dissimilar where one party’s product “[wa]s a service while the other[’s] [wa]s a tangible good”
• finding no correlation because “aside from the fact that these goods are used together, there is no indication that the consuming public would perceive them as originating from the same source”
• RITZ and THE RITZ KIDS 45 Opposition Nos. 91118482; 91118950; 91155075; and 91182937 create different commercial impressions
• RITZ and THE RITZ KIDS 45 Opposition Nos. 91118482; 91118950; 91155075; and 91182937 create different commercial impressions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).