Skip to main content
· 8/15/2000

Tom Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf)

Citations

  • 222 F.3d 943
  • 55 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1842
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 19980
  • 2000 WL 1146748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a “belief in likely damage can be shown by establishing a direct commercial interest”
  • finding that standing is established through a plaintiff’s proof of ownership of a federal 4 Opposition No. 91200510 registration
  • stating that the TTAB need consider only likelihood-of-confusion factors for which evidence is submitted
  • “Standing ... requires only that the party seeking cancellation believe that it is likely to be damaged by the registration.”
  • approving finding that “it could not conclude there had even been an opportunity for actual confusion”
  • “Regarding descriptive terms, this court has noted that the ‘descriptive component of a mark may be given little weight in reaching a conclusion on likelihood of confusion.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Archer, Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.