Skip to main content
Court of Claims· 7/28/1982

Koster v. United States

Citations

  • 231 Ct. Cl. 301
  • 685 F.2d 407
  • 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that failure to retire plaintiff at temporary promotion grade is a matter beyond court’s review
  • stating that plaintiff was bound by the military board’s decision “unless he established that that determination was arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence”
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President
  • finding jurisdiction to review procedural aspects of a decision of the Secretary of the Army, acting on behalf of the President

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett, Nichols, Skelton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Koster v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.