Skip to main content
· 1/30/1985

In Re National Data Corporation

Citations

  • 753 F.2d 1056
  • 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 749
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark”
  • holding that a “likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark”
  • explaining the effect of disclaimer and descriptive words in likelihood of confusion analysis
  • “Regarding descriptive terms, this court has noted that the descriptive component of a mark may be given little weight in reaching a conclusion on the likelihood of confusion”
  • nothing improper in giving more or less weight to a particular feature of a mark, provided the ultimate conclusion rests on a consideration of the marks in their entireties
  • “[R]egistration affords prima facie rights in the mark as a whole, not in any component.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Smith, Nies

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.