Han Beauty, Inc. And Trevive, Inc. v. Alberto-Culver Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Board did not err in not addressing lack of actual confusion when record did not show that the marks were used side-by-side for an ex- tended period of time
• a family of marks arises “if the purchasing public recognizes that the common characteristic is indicative of a common origin of the goods.”
• Applicant’s mark for hair care products would be perceived as indicating applicant’s goods have common origin with opposer’s hair care products marketed under family of similar marks
• “While it must consider each factor for which it has evidence, the [b]oard may focus its analysis on dispositive factors, such as similarity of the marks and relatedness of the goods.”
• “While it must consider each factor for which it has evidence, the Board may focus its analysis on dispositive factors, such as similarity of the marks and relatedness of the goods.”
• “While it must con- sider each factor for which it has evidence, the Board may focus its analysis on dispositive factors, such as similarity of the marks and relatedness of the goods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).