Hewlett-Packard Company v. Packard Press, Inc. (Formerly Packquisition Corporation)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board must compare the goods and services listed in the relevant application and registrations even without ad- ditional evidence
• holding that a registration for “electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals” is “closely related” to a registration “covering facsimile machines, computers, and computer software”
• explaining the likelihood of confusion analysis “con- siders all DuPont factors for which there is evidence of rec- ord” but may focus on dispositive factors
• finding “electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals” related to “facsimile machines, computers, and computer software”
• explaining the likelihood of confusion analysis “con- siders all DuPont factors for which there is evidence of rec- ord” but may focus on dispositive factors
• noting the likelihood of confusion analysis “considers all DuPont factors for which there is evidence of record” but may focus on dispositive factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).