In Re Majestic Distilling Company, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “when word marks are identical but neither suggestive nor descriptive of the goods associated with them, the first DuPont factor weighs heavily against the applicant”
• describing likelihood of confusion “as a question of law based on findings of relevant underlying facts”
• malt liquor related to tequila given the identity of trade channels despite the fact that “malt liquor is a brewed product, whereas tequila is distilled”
• “...mistaken belief that [a good] is manufactured or sponsored by the same entity ... is precisely the mistake that Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act seeks to prevent”
• “...mistaken belief that [a good] is manufactured or sponsored by the same entity ... is precisely the mistake that Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act seeks to prevent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).