Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 248 S.W.3d 194
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 327
  • 2008 WL 582344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “defendant waives any complaint on appeal concerning the admissibility of evidence when he affirmatively states, ‘No objection,’ at the time the evidence is offered”
  • holding that a “defendant waives any complaint on appeal concerning the admissibility of evidence when he affirmatively states, ‘No objection,’ at the time the evidence is offered”
  • holding that a “defendant waives any complaint on appeal concerning the admissibility of evidence when he affirmatively states, ‘No objection,’ at the time the evidence is offered”
  • holding that objection to admission of evidence is not prerequisite to article 38.23 instruction
  • holding that objection to admission of evidence is not prerequisite to article 38.23 instruction
  • concluding that appellant “waived any claim on appeal that trial court erred in admitting . . . evidence” where he stated “no objection” at the time “the State offered that evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

153 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Holmes v. State

454 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.